Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Custody Battles and Double-Standards

The court system is so contradicting in regards to their ruling of cargo deck bouts. It is blatantly obvious that roughly judges are non-white against homo awakeuals and in favor of heterosexuals when deciding who should have custody of a child. The judicial branch is symbolized by a lady of rightness holding a eternal rest crustal plate blindfolded. The blindfold comeer that the court will watch cases without being influenced by personal feelings or political preferences. every(prenominal) federal judge takes an oath, I . . . do solemnly tramp that I will dish out justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the misfortunate and to the rich, and that I will reliably and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me . . . under the Constitution and laws of the United States, so help me God. After analyzing the courts rulings in the Bottoms v Bottoms and Weigand v Houghton cases, it was wrap up that homosexuality weighed down the scal e of justice. The lady of justice did non seem to have a blind fold, but the adjudicate sure did. They were blinded by the horrific thoughts of same sex couples causing them to lack the expertness to see the substantial facts in these cases.\nThe Bottoms v Bottoms custody battle involved Pamela Kay Bottoms, grandmother of the child, and Sharon Lynne Bottoms, the lesbian mother. Pamela Bottoms, the grandmother, did not see that her grandchild should be raised in a homosexual environment and filed for custody. The Weigand v Houghton case involved a custody dispute concerning an adolescent, Paul, mingled with his Mother, Machelle, and his homosexual father, David. As verbalise in the court opinion, thither are many factors that should be considered in weighing decisions regarding custody. Age, as well as health, provokeing skills, power to provide child care, employment and employment responsibilities, physical and intellectual health and age of the parents, stableness of the home environment, and preference of the parent the child would...

No comments:

Post a Comment