Flowers For Algernon

Flowers for Algernon written by Daniel Keyes Daniel Keyes, the writer of the short story Flowers for Algernon encourages a particular response from the strikeer by placing speech pattern on the conventions of point of view, structure and language. In the short story, Charlie, a mentally challenged man, is the subject of an experiment to improve his intelligence. In this way, Keyes positions his ratifier to way the theme of human experimentation. Keyes choice for point of view is best person. He uses this so we force out hear life by means of with(predicate) Charlies eyes. This encourages the skimer to sympathise with Charlie and study what he goes through. By contain a naive narrator, we believe what Charlie tells us, because he is innocent and immature; for example, in the beginning of the story, he does not understand what the doctors, Strauss and Nemur be talking ab come forward but he feels proud and writes overmatch what the doctors say. Using first person poi nt of view, we understand that Charlie is a good person and that encourages the reader to see the doctors as bad. We besides share his likes and dislikes. We be intimate with Charlie his muster and fall and this makes the live more(prenominal) than(prenominal) vivid. It encourages the reader to examination what is being done to Charlie and to question the moral philosophy of science. Structure is other convention forceful by Keyes. In Flowers for Algernon, Keyes uses diary form so the reader believes what Charlie says. It also allows stuffiness with Charlie so we share his experiences, hearts, thoughts and we critise those who persecute him. The apologue structures the story to read like the fall in contemporaries. Keyes relates to a part of Genesis using terms like, Paradise Lost, feeling natural as a jaybird and boot knocked pop(p) out of the mill (garden), when Adam ate the fruit from the shoetree of knowledge, when Charlie felt naked is when Adam realised h e was naked after eating the fruit. Being sh! ut out of the milling machinery was like when God drove Adam out of the angle of Eden. By using the progress report form, we are shown how stand Charlie is smart for and how quickly he regresses, we are then sympathetic towards Charlie and angry and disgusted towards human experimentation and science. Language is some other convention emphasised in the story. The language used in the beginning is simple and primary.

By using scurvy spelling, woeful grammar and demonstrating a poor command of language, Keyes positions us to understand that Charlie is mentally challenged and we see him as a victim and powerless. Language in our culture is powerful and as Charlies language changes, he becomes more powerful and people are scared of him until they throw him out of the factory. The increase of power means he can materialise along more effectively and we can understand his thoughts and read his croak better, then feel proud of his efforts and share his success. In the beginning, when Keyes uses simple, basic language, this positions the reader to understand that Charlie is simple and basic. In conclusion, we can see how Daniel Keyes encourages a particular response from the reader by placing emphasis on the conventions of point of view, structure and language. We can experience with Charlie his rise and fall, his feelings and his thoughts, and we explore the theme of human experimentation. If you want to foil a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay