Why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor

Lenin became increasingly ill, there was rising tension between the both likely candidates to replace Lenin. Both Stalin and Trotsky wanted Lenins place practise them in a Power struggle. In 1924 Lenin died. Trotsky and Stalin were the obvious contenders for transmit Lenins place as loss requireer of the bolshies. When Lenin died he left(a) no clear successor to lead the Communist society (the Bolsheviks), so it was assumed that Trotsky was going to be Lenins successor, because Trotsky was very underweight to him (his remedy hand man). Stalin was the General Secretary for Commissar. He was a roughshod man with much strength that helped him assoil leadership. He was the rest bingle in the Bolshevik party, but appeared as Lenins hard-core colleague after his death in 1924. Stalin took on the hypothesize of General Secretary and that put him in arrest of the Bolshevik party. With his position, he promoted his friends and those who supported him and he demoted his op position and gave them dull jobs. This helped Stalin gain power because he got to know the party well. This gained him a carry on of support and could easily infiltrate his enamor on the party. likewise Stalin managed to out smart Trotsky.

On Lenins funeral Stalin told Trotsky the legal injury day intentionally so that he wouldnt turn up and it would make him research bad to the Bolsheviks. Trotsky had Many Weaknesses also that be him the Position of leader of the Bolsheviks. For one he had only conjugate the Bolsheviks at the simoleons of the revolution. Also Further more Trotsky was Jewish and no one really wanted a Jew to lead them. Because of his faith he knew that Stalin woul d probably come out to a higher place him s! elf. Another suit to his weaknesses was that he ran the red... If you want to get a full essay, install it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay